Independent Research Sites
Sites that want a structured review of how referrals move through intake, prescreening, and handoff before reaching coordinator review.
Enrollment Operations Consulting
An advisory engagement that assesses the current enrollment workflow, identifies operational bottlenecks, designs clearer roles and processes, and produces documentation, measurement, and implementation recommendations.
Clinical eligibility determinations, informed consent, medical decisions, and protocol oversight remain with the authorized site team.
An enrollment operations consultant reviews the existing process, identifies bottlenecks, clarifies ownership and status definitions, designs future-state workflows, and recommends documentation, measurement, and implementation priorities. Deliverables can include a documented current state, prioritized findings, a future-state workflow, handoff standards, and a phased implementation roadmap.
Consulting assesses and designs improvements; it does not include ongoing candidate outreach, scheduling coordination, or referral handling. Organizations seeking recurring execution can explore hands-on intake and preliminary prescreening support.
This engagement is designed for research organizations that want a structured review of the enrollment workflow between referral and randomization.
Sites that want a structured review of how referrals move through intake, prescreening, and handoff before reaching coordinator review.
Organizations managing enrollment across multiple locations and studies that need consistent intake and prescreening standards.
Networks seeking to standardize enrollment workflows and clarify ownership across sites and teams.
Leaders responsible for enrollment performance who need clearer visibility into where candidates slow down or drop out.
Teams with adequate referral activity that are not seeing corresponding enrollment improvement.
Groups dealing with coordinator overload, slow follow-up, fragmented intake, or unclear workflow ownership.
These are the operational issues that an enrollment operations consulting engagement is designed to review and help address.
Candidates enter the pipeline but do not reach the coordinator team in a timely or documented way.
Intake processes vary by study, site, or staff member, producing variable referral quality downstream.
Response times to referred candidates are inconsistent, and follow-up sequences are not clearly defined.
Coordinators spend time re-contacting candidates or gathering information that should have been organized upstream.
The team cannot easily see where each candidate is in the enrollment pathway or what the next step should be.
Transitions between intake, prescreening, and clinical review lack structured documentation and context.
More referrals are entering the pipeline, but enrollment numbers are not improving proportionally.
The organization lacks stage-specific data showing where candidates are lost between referral and randomization.
The organization and Consent2Randomize define the advisory scope around the current-state questions, available records, desired deliverables, and implementation priorities.
Deliverables are selected during scoping so the engagement produces the workflow, ownership, documentation, measurement, and implementation materials the organization needs.
The engagement follows four steps, with the depth and duration of each step shaped by the organization's scope and priorities.
We discuss your current enrollment operations, referral activity, and the questions or concerns prompting the engagement. This step establishes scope and priorities.
We review how candidates currently move from referral through intake, prescreening, follow-up, handoff, and coordinator review. We examine workflows, documentation, and any available stage-level data.
We present findings on where candidates are slowing down or dropping out, along with prioritized recommendations for workflow, handoff, standardization, and measurement.
If requested, we help sequence ownership, documentation, training, measurement, and change-management steps so the organization can implement the recommendations.
Recruitment creates awareness, inquiries, and referrals. Enrollment operations manages what happens after those referrals arrive. Software may support workflow execution, but software alone does not establish process ownership, define intake and handoff standards, resolve staffing decisions, or set implementation priorities.
Consent2Randomize focuses on the operational system between referral and randomization: the workflows, roles, and standards used to document how referrals reach coordinator review and screening. The engagement addresses process design, not candidate supply or software selection.
For a detailed comparison of these functions, see enrollment operations vs. patient recruitment.
Common questions about clinical trial enrollment operations consulting.
If your organization wants a structured review of the workflow behind enrollment, we can assess your current operations and recommend what should change.